Guide to Rho(D) Immune Globulin in Women With Molecularly Defined Asian-type DEL (c.1227G>A).

Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn is a potential risk for D-negative mothers who produce anti-D during pregnancy, which can lead to morbidity and mortality in subsequent pregnancies. To prevent this hemolytic disease, Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIG) is generally administered to D-negative mothers without anti-D at 28 weeks of gestation and shortly after delivery. However, current guidelines suggest that pregnant mothers with molecularly defined weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, and 4.1 do not need RhIG as they are unlikely to produce alloanti-D when exposed to fetuses with D-positive red cells. This issue and the necessity of RHD genotyping have been extensively discussed in Western countries, where these variants are relatively common. Recent evidence indicates that women with Asian-type DEL (c.1227G>A) also do not form alloanti-D when exposed to D-positive red cells. We report that mothers with molecularly defined Asian-type DEL, similar to those with weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, and 4.1, do not require RhIG before and after delivery. Collectively, this review could pave the way for the revision of international guidelines to include the selective use of RhIG based on specific genotypes, particularly in women with the Asian-type DEL.

Prevention of Rhesus-D Alloimmunization in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: Economic Analysis of Three Management Strategies.

Anti-D alloimmunization in the first trimester of pregnancy has long been the subject of prevention with anti-D immunoglobulins during events at risk of fetomaternal hemorrhage. Although the efficacy of preventing anti-D alloimmunization by an injection of immunoglobulin at 28 weeks of gestation (WG) is obvious, the literature provides little evidence of the effectiveness before 12+6 WG and several countries have modified their recommendations. In the presumed absence of a difference in alloimmunization risk between early and late prevention, our objective was to evaluate and compare the cost of treatment for 3 alloimmunization prevention strategies in France, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. This was a single-center retrospective study. Our target population included all women who received anti-D immunoglobulins (Rhophylac) in the first trimester of pregnancy before 12+6 WG at Nantes University Hospital in 2018 (N = 356). Within the target population, 2 other populations were constituted based on British (N = 145) and Dutch (N = 142) clinical practice guidelines (CPG). These 3 populations were analyzed for the comparative cost of treatment for prevention from a health system perspective. The average cost of Rhophylac alloimmunization prevention for 1 episode was €117.8 from a health system perspective. The total cost attributed to prevention in 2018 at Nantes University Hospital (N = 356) was €41,931.4 according to this perspective. If the UK CPG or Dutch CPG had been applied to the Nantes target population, a saving of around 60% would have been achieved. At the national level, the cost according to the health system perspective specifically attributable to induced abortion (N estimated = 26,916) could represent a total cost of €3,170,704. This study highlighted the high cost of the French prevention strategy in the first trimester of pregnancy compared with British or Dutch strategies. The modification of our practices would allow substantial financial savings to the French health system but would also avoid the nonrecommended exposure to a blood product at this term, would allow a faster medical management and a relief of the care system.

Fetal Anemia: Determinants and Perinatal Outcomes according to the Method of Intrauterine Blood Transfusion.

INTRODUCTION: Fetal anemia from hemolytic disease treated by intrauterine transfusion (IUT) can be performed by intraperitoneal, intracardiac, and intravascular transfusion (IVT). Objective of our study was to compare different transfusion techniques. METHODS: Retrospective review of IUT secondary to red cell alloimmunization was conducted at eight international centers from 2012 to 2020. Severe anemia suspected if middle cerebral artery peaks systolic velocity ≥1.5 multiples of the median. Demographic, delivery, and postnatal variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Total of 344 procedures, 325 IVT and 19 other techniques (non-IVT) included. No difference in demographics, history of stillbirth (20.5 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.7), prior pregnancy IUT (25.6 vs. 31.6%, p = 0.5) or neonatal transfusion (36.1 vs. 43.8%, p = 0.5). At first IUT, non-IVT had higher hydrops (42.1% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.03), lower starting hematocrit (13.3% [±6] vs. 17.7% [±8.2], p = 0.04), and trend toward lower gestational age (24.6 [20.1-27] vs. 26.4 [23.2-29.6] weeks, p = 0.08). No difference in birthweight, neonatal phototherapy, exchange, or simple transfusion was observed. CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest studies comparing techniques to treat fetal anemia. IVT was most performed, other techniques were more likely performed in hydrops, and lower starting hematocrit was seen. Neither technique affected outcomes. This study may suggest that physician's experience may be the strongest contributor of outcomes.

Induced Abortion and the Risk of Rh Sensitization.

Importance: While population-level data suggest Rh immunoglobulin is unnecessary before 12 weeks' gestation, clinical evidence is limited. Thus, guidelines vary, creating confusion surrounding risks and benefits of Rh testing and treatment. As abortion care in traditional clinical settings becomes harder to access, many people are choosing to self-manage and need to know if ancillary blood type testing is necessary. Objective: To determine how frequently maternal exposure to fetal red blood cells (fRBCs) exceeds the most conservative published threshold for Rh sensitization in induced first-trimester abortion. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study using high-throughput flow cytometry to detect circulating fRBCs in paired maternal blood samples before and after induced first-trimester abortion (medication or procedural). Individuals undergoing induced first-trimester abortion before 12 weeks 0 days' gestation were included. Paired blood samples were available from 506 participants who underwent either medical (n = 319 [63.0%]) or procedural (n = 187 [37.0%]) abortion. Exposure: Induced first-trimester abortion. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with fRBC counts above the sensitization threshold (125 fRBCs/5 million total RBCs) after induced first-trimester abortion. Results: Among the 506 participants, the mean (SD) age was 27.4 (5.5) years, 313 (61.9%) were Black, and 123 (24.3%) were White. Three of the 506 participants had elevated fRBC counts at baseline; 1 of these patients had an elevated fRBC count following the abortion (0.2% [95% CI, 0%-0.93%]). No other participants had elevated fRBC counts above the sensitization threshold after induced first-trimester abortion. The median change from baseline was 0 fRBCs, with upper 95th and 99th percentiles of 24 and 35.6 fRBCs, respectively. Although there was a strong association between the preabortion and postabortion fRBC counts, no other baseline characteristic was significantly associated with postabortion fRBC count. Conclusions and Relevance: Induced first-trimester abortion is not a risk factor for Rh sensitization, indicating that Rh testing and treatment are unnecessary before 12 weeks' gestation. This evidence may be used to inform international guidelines for Rh immunoglobulin administration following first-trimester induced abortion.

Isoinmunización Rh en bajas respondedoras: Reporte de caso / Rh Isoimmunization in Low Responders: Case Report / Isoimunização Rh em pacientes com baixa resposta: relato de caso

Introducción. La isoinmunización Rh consiste en la producción de anticuerpos maternos en una gestante Rh negativa contra los antígenos de los eritrocitos Rh positivos fetales ocasionados por una hemorragia fetomaterna. En población gestante, el 15% son Rh negativo y la severidad de la afectación fetal está relacionada con una serie de procesos inmunológicos y la historia obstétrica. Si una gestante Rh negativa con riesgo de isoinmunización no recibe profilaxis con inmunoglobulina Anti-D se inmuniza el 16% en la primera gestación, el 30% en la segunda y el 50% después de la tercera. Con este reporte de caso queremos describir el subgrupo de pacientes gestantes con isoinmunización Rh bajas respondedoras. Presentación del caso. G9P5C1A2Gem1V7 de 43 años, remitida en semana 30 de gestación por isoinmunización Rh, no recibió inmunoglobulina Anti-D durante este embarazo, ni en los anteriores ni en el posparto, reporte de Coombs indirecto de 1/4 que se eleva a 1/16, seguimiento ecográfico normal. En semana 35.3 presenta anemia fetal leve y por tratarse de un embarazo alrededor del término se finaliza por cesárea. Recién nacido con adecuado peso para la edad gestacional, quien fue dado de alta a las 72 horas con evolución satisfactoria. Discusión. Las gestantes con isoinmunización Rh bajas respondedoras se sensibilizan con altos volúmenes sanguíneos sin repercusión hemodinámica in utero, produciendo una enfermedad hemolítica fetal leve. Esta respuesta inmune es poco frecuente y está asociada a factores protectores; sin embargo, son necesarios más estudios que sustenten esta condición. Conclusiones. El control prenatal y el Coombs indirecto cuantitativo seriado son las principales herramientas para la prevención de la isoinmunización. El conocimiento de la respuesta inmunológica permite identificar el subgrupo de las bajas respondedoras que tienen una evolución clínica más leve y menor morbilidad neonatal. Palabras clave: Embarazo; Isoinmunización Rh; Eritroblastosis Fetal; Globulina Inmune RHO(D); Hidropesía Fetal.

Introduction. Rh isoimmunization consists of a Rh-negative pregnant woman producing maternal antibodies against the antigens of fetal Rh-positive erythrocytes due to fetomaternal hemorrhage. 15% of the pregnant population is Rh negative, and the severity of fetal effects is related to a series of immunological processes and the obstetric history. If a Rh-negative pregnant woman at risk of isoimmunization does not receive a prophylaxis of Anti-D immunolobulin, 16% are immunized in the first pregnancy, 30% in the second and 50% after the third. In this case report we will describe the subgroup of low responder pregnant patients with Rh isoimmunization. Case Presentation. G9P5C1A2Gem1V7, 43 years old, referred on the 30th week of pregnancy due to Rh isoimmunization. She did not receive Anti-D immunolobulin during this pregnancy, nor in her previous pregnancies, nor during postpartum. Indirect Coombs report of 1/4, which increases to 1/16. Ultrasound monitoring is normal. At week 35.3 she presented mild fetal anemia, and because the pregnancy was near its term, it was ended by cesarean section. Newborn with adequate weight considering the gestational age, who was then discharged after 72 hours with satisfactory evolution. Discussion. Low responder pregnant women with Rh isoimmunization are sensitized with high blood volumes but without hemodynamic repercussions in utero, producing a mild fetal hemolytic disease. This immune response is infrequent and is associated with protective factors; however, further studies are required to support this condition. Conclusions. Prenatal control and serialized quantitative indirect Coombs testing are the main tools for the prevention of isoimmunization. Knowledge of the immunological response enables identifying the subgroup of low responders who present a milder clinical evolution and lower newborn morbidity. Keywords: Pregnancy; Rh Isoimmunization; Erythroblastosis, Fetal; RHO(D) Immune Globulin; Hydrops Fetalis.

Introdução. A isoimunização Rh consiste na produção de anticorpos maternos em uma gestante Rh negativa contra os antígenos dos eritrócitos fetais Rh positivos causados por hemorragia fetomaterna. Na população gestante, 15% são Rh negativos e a gravidade do envolvimento fetal está relacionada a uma série de processos imunológicos e ao histórico obstétrico. Se uma gestante Rh negativa com risco de isoimunização não receber profilaxia com imunoglobulina Anti-D, imuniza-se 16% na primeira gestação, 30% na segunda e 50% após a terceira. Com este relato de caso, queremos descrever o subgrupo de pacientes gestantes com isoimunização Rh de baixa resposta. Apresentação do caso. G9P5C1A2Gem1V7, 43 anos, encaminhada na 30ª semana de gestação para isoimunização Rh, não recebeu imunoglobulina Anti-D nesta gestação, nem nas anteriores nem no puerpério, laudo de Coombs indireto de 1/4 que sobe para 1/16, acompanhamento ultrassonográfico normal. Na semana 35,3, apresentou anemia fetal leve e por se tratar de uma gestação próxima ao termo, foi interrompida por cesariana. Recém-nascido com peso adequado para a idade gestacional, que recebeu alta às 72 horas com evolução satisfatória. Discussão. Gestantes com isoimunização Rh de baixa resposta são sensibilizadas com elevados volumes sanguíneos sem repercussões hemodinâmicas in utero, produzindo doença hemolítica fetal leve. Essa resposta imune é rara e está associada a fatores protetores; no entanto, mais estudos são necessários para fundamentar esta condição. Conclusões. O controle pré-natal e o Coombs indireto quantitativo seriado são as principais ferramentas para a prevenção da isoimunização. O conhecimento da resposta imunológica permite identificar o subgrupo de pacientes com baixa resposta que apresentam evolução clínica mais branda e menor morbidade neonatal. Palavras-chave: Gravidez; Isoimunização Rh; Eritroblastose Fetal; Inmunoglobulina RHO (D), Hidropisia Fetal.

Terminating Routine Cord Blood RhD Typing of the Newborns to Guide Postnatal Anti-D Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis Based on the Results of Fetal RHD Genotyping.

INTRODUCTION: Targeted routine antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin (Ig) only to RhD-negative pregnant women who carry RhD-positive fetuses (determined by fetal RHD genotyping) has reduced D-alloimmunization significantly when administered in addition to postnatal prophylaxis. Achieving high analysis sensitivity and few false-negative fetal RHD results will make RhD typing of the newborn redundant. Postnatal prophylaxis can then be given based on the result of fetal RHD genotyping. Terminating routine RhD typing of the newborns in cord blood will streamline maternity care. Accordingly, we compared the results of fetal RHD genotyping with RhD typing of the newborns. METHODS: Fetal RHD genotyping was performed, and antenatal anti-D Ig was administered at gestational week 24 and 28, respectively. Data for 2017-2020 are reported. RESULTS: Ten laboratories reported 18,536 fetal RHD genotypings, and 16,378 RhD typing results of newborns. We found 46 false-positive (0.28%) and seven false-negative (0.04%) results. Sensitivity of the assays was 99.93%, while specificity was 99.24%. CONCLUSION: Few false-negative results support the good analysis quality of fetal RHD genotyping. Routine cord blood RhD typing will therefore be discontinued nationwide and postnatal anti-D Ig will now be given based on the result of fetal RHD genotyping.

Rh(D) immune globulin administration in pregnancy: Retrospective audit of patient safety events followed by targeted educational intervention with Bayesian analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine local patient safety events related to the administration of anti-Rh(D) immune globin (RhIG) during pregnancy, and to follow-up with targeted educational intervention to improve knowledge of this process. BACKGROUND: Administration RhIG is established treatment for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn (HDFN). However, patient safety events in relation to its correct use continue to occur. METHODS: A retrospective audit of patient safety events related to RhIG administration during pregnancy was performed. Targeted educational intervention in the form of PowerPoint® presentation were given to nursing staff, laboratory staff and physicians and evaluated with pre- and post-tests using multiple-choice questions given immediately before and after the presentation. RESULTS: An annual incidence of 0.24% of patient safety events related to the administration of RhIG during pregnancy was found. These events were mostly in the preanalytical phase, for example mislabelled samples or samples for D-rosette/Kleihauer-Betke testing drawn from the baby, not the mother. Using Bayesian analysis, the probability of positive effect for the targeted educational intervention was 100% with a median improved score of 29%. This was compared with a control group using standard curriculum education intervention based on the current curriculum for nursing, laboratory and medical students which showed a median improved score of only 4.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of RhIG during pregnancy is a multistep process involving health care professionals of several disciplines providing opportunities to enhance the curriculum for nursing, laboratory and medical students and to ensure on-going education.

Anti-RH1 alloimmunization: At what maternal antibody threshold is there a risk of severe fetal anemia?

BACKGROUND: To define a threshold of maternal antibodies at risk of severe fetal anemia in patients followed for anti-RH1 alloimmunization (AI). STUDY, DESIGN, AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients followed for anti-RH1 AI at the Lille University Hospital. The first group, severe anemia, included patients who received one or more in utero transfusions (IUT) or who were induced before 37 weeks of pregnancy for suspected severe fetal anemia. The second group, absence of severe anemia, corresponded to patients without intervention during pregnancy related to AI. Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values for screening for severe fetal anemia were calculated for the antibody thresholds of 3.5 and 5 IU/ml for the quantification. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2018, 207 patients were included 135 in the severe anemia group and 72 in the no severe anemia group. No severe anemia was observed for an antibody titer below 16. For an antibody threshold of 3.5 IU/ml, the sensitivity was 98.2%, with 30.2% false positives. All severe anemias were detected in the second trimester; two cases of severe anemia were not detected in the third trimester. For an antibody threshold of 5 IU/ml, the sensitivity was lower at 95.6%, with five cases of severe anemia not detected. CONCLUSION: The antibody threshold of 3.5 IU/ml for the quantification and 16 for the titration allow targeting patients requiring close monitoring by an experienced team in case of anti-RH1 AI.